undrmnd is partly an argument against the algorithmic feed, partly a love letter to the public library, and partly an experiment in slow, communal learning. What follows is the reading underneath it — first the writers who shaped the argument, then the peer-reviewed research that became the project's working bibliography. The full, living version is kept in a research notebook.
Reading that shaped the argument
-
01
Jenny Odell — How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy.
Melville House, 2019. On bioregionalism, attention as a public good, and the case for stepping out of the feed. jennyodell.com
-
02
Cory Doctorow — The “Enshittification” of TikTok and subsequent essays.
Wired / Pluralistic, 2023–present. On the lifecycle decay of platforms and the case for user-owned infrastructure. pluralistic.net
-
03
Tristan Harris & the Center for Humane Technology — talks and writing on attention design.
The framing of “digital anhedonia” in the site copy owes a debt here. humanetech.com
-
04
Robin Sloan — Notes on the home-cooked app and the “web of small computers.”
On software made for one community, at one scale, with care. robinsloan.com
-
05
Maggie Appleton — Digital Gardens and writing on tools for thought.
On personal knowledge as a slow, evergreen practice rather than a stream. maggieappleton.com
-
06
Ivan Illich — Deschooling Society and Tools for Conviviality.
Harper & Row, 1971–73. On learning webs, public infrastructure for curiosity, and convivial tools that don't consume the user. The deep, quiet ancestor of this whole project.
-
07
Elinor Ostrom — Governing the Commons.
Cambridge University Press, 1990. The structural reading list for anything calling itself a “commons.”
Peer-reviewed research » the working corpus
Thirty-four papers and chapters underpin the thesis. They're grouped here the way they sit in the notebook: the neuroscience and ethics of attention; design that addicts and design that heals; what citizen science and open educational resources can teach a small library; and the politics of learning in public.
A. The attention economy & its neuro-behavioural cost
-
08
Sharpe, B. T. & Spooner, R. A. — Dopamine-scrolling: a modern public health challenge requiring urgent attention.
-
09
Satani, A., Satani, K. K., Barodia, P. & Joshi, H. — Modern Day High: The Neurocognitive Impact of Social Media Usage.
-
10
Lakhan, S. E. — Hijacked by the Feed: Social Media Neuroengineering-Induced Digital Anhedonia.
-
11
Aitken, A., Rahimpour Jounghani, A. et al. — Naturalistic fNIRS assessment reveals decline in executive function and altered prefrontal activation following social media use.
-
12
Balcıoğlu, Y. S., Bayraktar, Ü. & Güven, E. — The Scrolling Paradox: Analyzing Instagram Addiction Patterns in the Digital Age.
-
13
Foroughi, B., Griffiths, M. D., Iranmanesh, M. & Salamzadeh, Y. — Associations Between Instagram Addiction, Academic Performance, Social Anxiety, Depression, and Life Satisfaction Among University Students.
-
14
Williams, J. & Cavazos-Rehg, P. — Won't We Know If It's Toxic? A Review of the Impacts of Social Media on Public Health.
-
15
Wu, Vargas et al. — Does mindfulness moderate the association between dimensions of social media engagement and depressive and anxious symptoms.
-
16
Üztemur, Lin, Pakpour et al. — Moderated mediation effect of problematic social media use on social networking site discontinuance.
Cureus, vol. 17.
B. Design ethics, dark patterns & the right to disconnect
-
17
Saura, J. R., Palacios-Marqués, D. & Iturricha-Fernández, A. — Ethical design in social media: Assessing the main performance measurements of user online behavior modification.
Journal of Business Research, vol. 129 (2021), 271–281.
-
18
Esposito, F. & Cathoud Ferreira, T. M. — Addictive Design as an Unfair Commercial Practice: The Case of Hyper-Engaging Dark Patterns.
-
19
Bhargava, V. R. & Velasquez, M. — Ethics of the Attention Economy: The Problem of Social Media Addiction.
-
20
Abeele, M. V., De Leyn, T., Verlinden, A. et al. — Digital disconnection as a plight or right? A manifesto to re-imagine digital disconnection as a reasonable accommodation.
-
21
Wong, P. H. — Confucian Social Media: An Oxymoron?
C. Designing media that heals » reflection, literacy & well-being
-
22
Vaingankar, J. A., van Dam, R. M., Samari, E. et al. — Social Media–Driven Routes to Positive Mental Health Among Youth: Qualitative Enquiry and Concept Mapping Study.
-
23
Andersen, A. I. O., Finserås, T. R., Hjetland, G. J. et al. — Can Social Media Use Be More Health-Promoting? Description and Pilot Evaluation of a School-Based Program to Increase Awareness and Reflection on the Use of Social Media.
-
24
Zhang, C., Mohamad, E., Azlan, A. A. et al. — Social Media and eHealth Literacy Among Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review.
-
25
Coorey, G., Peiris, D., Usherwood, T. et al. — Persuasive design features within a consumer-focused eHealth intervention integrated with the electronic health record.
-
26
Rathnabai, A. S. — Nurturing Mental and Emotional Well-being in the Cyberspace.
D. Citizen science — learning in public, with strangers
-
27
Hajibayova, L. — (Un)theorizing citizen science: Investigation of theories applied to citizen science studies.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2019.
-
28
Cotey, S. R., Dunbar-Wallis, A. K., Golumbic, Y. N. et al. — Online citizen science in higher education courses.
Ecosphere, 2025.
-
29
Golumbic, Y. N., Baram-Tsabari, A. & Koichu, B. — Engagement and Communication Features of Scientifically Successful Citizen Science Projects.
-
30
Batsaikhan, A., Kurtz, W. & Hachinger, S. — Web Technologies to Support Scientific Research and Education in Citizen Science — A Case Study in Germany.
-
31
Martin, V. — Citizens as Scientists: What Influences Public Contributions to Marine Research?
-
32
Weingart, P., Joubert, M. & Connoway, K. — Public engagement with science — Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy.
-
33
Árnason, V. — Scientific citizenship in a democratic society.
2012.
-
34
Maciuk, K., Apollo, M., Skorupa, J. et al. — Facebook Is “For Old People” — So Why Are We Still Studying It the Most? A Critical Look at Social Media in Science.
E. Open education, engagement & learning architecture
-
35
Scanlon, E. — Open educational resources in support of science learning: tools for inquiry and observation.
-
36
Trowler, V. — Negotiating Contestations and Chaotic Conceptions: Engaging [Student Engagement].
Higher Education Quarterly, 2015.
-
37
Mulvey, K. L., Cerda-Smith, J., Joy, A. & Ozturk, E. — A Latent Class Analysis Predicting STEM Career Interest and Perceptions of Barriers.
Social Development, 2025.
-
38
Macedo, D. & Mark, I. — Supporting Success: Qualitative Study of Mentoring CASC Candidates Through Structured Exam Preparation.
-
39
Dealtry, R. — When e-learning is not enough — The design and management of an organisation's lifelong learning curriculum.
-
40
Benavot, A., Odora Hoppers, C., Stepanek Lockhart, A. & Hinzen, H. — Reimagining adult education and lifelong learning for all: Historical and critical perspectives.
-
41
Suomi, K., Kuoppakangas, P., Stenvall, J., Pekkola, E. & Kivistö, J. — Revisiting ‘the shotgun wedding of industry and academia’ — empirical evidence from Finland.
Citations are abbreviated for legibility. Some bibliographic records—with DOIs, full author lists, and reading notes—live in the working notebook. If a paper here is yours and you'd like it linked or corrected, write to err698@g.harvard.edu.